Recently Released PY-IN Notes V.2: 1970656 - Exemption Under Sec 80 D : Error while updating Actual and proposed contribution filed under paym / 1983332 - ESS IT Declaration : Backend actual amount not reflecting on ESS for"Income from Other Sources'

................................................................................................................................

As per the changes mentioned in the Note 1936835, an individual can declare investment

1. Either towards "Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee" or towards "Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee".

2. Either towards " Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents non-senior Citizen)" or towards "Medical Insr Premium(Payment on behalf of parents senior Ctz)".

But in case employee enters amount under  proposed contribution of  "Medical Insr Premium (Non-Senior Citizen) Employee" and  Actual contribution  of "Medical Insr Premium (Senior Citizen) Employee", system throws an error. which is incorrect.

Validation on proposed contribution field should be seperate from the validation on actual contribution field in infotype 0585.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

You are using Employee Self Service (ESS) based IT Declaration application for employees in your organization. The 'Actual amount' column is enabled and employee record already exists in the backend for the financial year

for "Income from Other Sources".  In such a case whenever a new record is created the already available actual amount is not reflecting in ESS screen. Also the new record overwrites the actual amount of previous data.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

The Public Provident Fund limit for investment fund in the system is up to 70,000. Henceforth, the PPF limit for investment fund will be up to 99,99,999. The overall limit for PPF will fall in the basket of limit under Section 80C which is 1 Lakh.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

As per the Circular No. 8/2013, [F.No.275/192/2013-IT(B)], DATED 10-10-2013

"If annual rent paid by the employee exceeds Rs 1,00,000 per annum, it is mandatory for the employee to report PAN of the landlord to the employer. In case the landlord does not have a PAN, a declaration to this effect from the landlord along with the name and address of the landlord should be filed by the employee."

Till now in SAP system, there is no provision to capture the PAN of Landlord along with check if a declaration has been submitted.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

You are executing payroll (Tcode: PC00_M40_CALC), for employees in your oranization. Once the taxable income is arrived, the income tax payable is determined. In the process, tax payable is determined and then education cess and higher & sec education cess are derived from it. As per standard computation, education cess and higher & sec education cess are rounded invidually and then added to tax payable to arrive at Net Tax payable.

However, education cess and higher & sec education cess shall not be rounded individually. It shall be added to arrive at Net Tax payable and then the Net Tax payable shall be rounded.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

In an Organization if you are executing the  ESI Report via Transaction "PC00_M40_ESIF(report "HINCESI0" )", in that case all the employee, who are not eligible, are also appearing in the ALV List.  This behaviour is incorrect.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

You are executing the transaction Pc00_m40_swch to activate the AFY solution for employees in your organization. You have activated the 40AY switch and saved it and the corresponding table T54C0 is updated with parameter 03 for India. This should not happen if the Business Function is not activated in your system, irrespective of changing the switch status in Pc00_m40_swch.The system behaves inconsistently.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

You are executing payroll (TCode:PC00_M40_CALC_SIMU) for the employees working in your organization.
Provident Fund Contribution infotype (IT0587) has been maintained without checking NPS eligibility.
Warning messages in payroll log appears for NPS contribution even though the eligibility for NPS is not maintained.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

You are trying to determine tax rate and tax payable on bonus payments given to an employee. In case, there are no payroll results available for the employee in current Financial Year, tax payable is determined using previous year results. In such cases, the tax payable is determined, however, the tax rate is not provided by the payroll function. This leads to inconsistency.

For reference:

Employee 'X' receives joining bonus amount of INR 5,00,000 in the month of April 2013. Employee has joined the organization in April 2013 as well. Now, when you want to determine tax payable on this bonus amount, bonus amount is determined but the marginal tax rate is not provided. This creates inconsistency for other calculations.

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

While generating ECR (TCode: PC00_M40_EPF) of an employee, for a period in which employee turns 58 years of age, employer pension wages are not displayed on the output. It appears Blank.

For Reference:

Employee 'X' turns 58 years of age on 2nd January 2014. Payroll for employee has been executed and employer pension wagetypes have been generated as well since there are two days till employee reaches 58 years of age. When ECR is generated for January period i.e. 10/2013, employer pension wages do not appear in the output. This is inconsistent. Since, cluster results contain values, corresponding values shall appear on ECR as well

CourtesySAP

................................................................................................................................

I am not able to upload the latest updates in http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-26054 .

Here I am modifying one of my previous document and would like to update the recent notes from now onwards.

You will get the previos notes from  http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-26054